- Contains a title using the format listed above .25 points
- Contains the sources you used with links to these sources .25 points
- Contains a brief paragraph how it connects to your study of humanities. 1 point
- Contains the following "analytical elements":
- Observation: What did you choose? What do you see or hear or feel or think of in the choice you made? What is the subject of the work? If you chose a 'thing' what is the work made of and what techniques (colors, lines, shapes, textures)does the creator use? Be specific in your description. If you chose a place, be specific in your description of what you see or hear. Talk to your reader as though they cannot see the item but somehow must draw a painting of what you see or hear. 1 point
- Interpretation: What is your choice about? Give specific examples to support this statement in 2 sentences; do so in a way that teaches us something about your choice. Make Paulo Freire proud! .75 point
- Judgment: What led you to your choice? What do you think or feel about this choice? Why do you feel this way? Support your thoughts with specific observations. .5 point
- Questioning: What else would you like to know about this choice? When completing the question section, lead your audience into the question by stating a fact you do know, yet you still have the related question. This way, both your audience and you will have an educational experience. Example: I learned that John Steinbeck's Grapes of Wrath was based on his personal experience working with farm workers. I would like to know if the characters he used in that book are fictitious or are they people he met? .5 point
5. Using your classmates work from last week, tell us one thing you learned from 1 student. Is this one thing some common experience you share or some experience that is completely different than what you experienced? Is this one thing related to our class theoretical foundation and if so, how? Is that one thing related to historical or cultural context of this country or a different one? Link that persons blog to this entry (eg cut paste that blog entry here) . .5 point
I agree with Anthony that Friere probably wouldn't have had such an impact if he hadn't gone to Law school. Friere going to law school opened his mind about a variety of different things, and made him experience a different way of life, which is very important to the principals he teaches. Having different experiences and trying new and different things opens your mind to different cultures and ways of doing things, which is exactly what this class is about.
http://amusettihuman7.blogspot.com/2009/01/1b.html
LINKS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_California
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_the_United_States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_Walk_of_Fame
No comments:
Post a Comment